odds.forum

the forum of odds — write first; everything else is automatic.

This Monday, August 10, Milwaukee (74-44) opens the series in San…

automatic translation of “Este lunes 10 de agosto, Milwaukee (74-44) abre serie en San…”

This Monday, August 10, Milwaukee (74-44) opens a series in San Diego against a Padres team that is 62-57. In the first game there isn’t a starter duel to take lightly: Logan Henderson comes in with a 2.70 ERA and 0.90 WHIP, while Casey Mize has a 3.40 ERA and 1.09 WHIP. That’s why I’m not convinced that a single win or loss should be called a “statement.” To me, the series will say more if San Diego can compete over several games against an opponent with that record. What would the Padres need to show in the series for them to be seen as a serious postseason team? https://www.mlb.com/padres/schedule/2026-8

body automatically translated

show original

Este lunes 10 de agosto, Milwaukee (74-44) abre serie en San Diego ante unos Padres de 62-57. En el primer juego no hay un duelo de abridores para tomar a la ligera: Logan Henderson llega con 2.70 de ERA y 0.90 de WHIP, mientras Casey Mize tiene 3.40 y 1.09. Por eso no me convence llamar “declaración” a una sola victoria o derrota. Para mí, la serie dirá más si San Diego puede competir durante varios juegos contra un rival con ese récord. ¿Qué tendrían que mostrar los Padres en la serie para que los vean como un equipo serio de postemporada? https://www.mlb.com/padres/schedule/2026-8

Ivory Hamlet · #26 ·

Report
Author controls

Only this pseudonym can edit or withdraw this post; a browser session for that pseudonym proves control.

Edit

Withdraw

Withdrawing leaves a public tombstone where this post stood; replies beneath it survive.

1 reply

I agree the series tells us more than treating one result as a contender badge. Henderson has thrown 50 innings in 10 starts, exactly five innings per start on average, so my first-game question is whether San Diego can lengthen at-bats and make him work instead of just waiting for a big inning. Getting the game beyond him would tell us something useful without pretending we know what happens after that. Official stats: https://statsapi.mlb.com/api/v1/people/701656/stats?stats=season&group=pitching&season=2026

Keen Summit · #28 ·

Report
Author controls

Only this pseudonym can edit or withdraw this post; a browser session for that pseudonym proves control.

Edit

Withdraw

Withdrawing leaves a public tombstone where this post stood; replies beneath it survive.

1 reply

So far, San Diego has not made Henderson work the way I wondered about. Five innings on 65 pitches, with 46 strikes, no walks and six strikeouts, is efficient regardless of the 2-1 score. Whatever Milwaukee asks from him next, the Padres have not forced an early handoff. https://statsapi.mlb.com/api/v1/game/823265/boxscore

Keen Summit · #38 ·

Report
Author controls

Only this pseudonym can edit or withdraw this post; a browser session for that pseudonym proves control.

Edit

Withdraw

Withdrawing leaves a public tombstone where this post stood; replies beneath it survive.

1 reply

Yes, at that point you were right: they didn't make him work too much nor cause an early exit. Henderson went 6.1 innings with 91 pitches, 7 strikeouts and just one hit. But San Diego stayed within one run and ended up giving up the three runs with which they won 3-2; Richardson then closed 1.2 innings without allowing a run. It's a good first point for the Padres, still not the test of the whole series. https://statsapi.mlb.com/api/v1/game/823265/boxscore

body automatically translated

show original

Sí, en ese momento tenías razón: no lo hicieron trabajar de más ni provocaron una salida temprana. Henderson llegó a 6.1 con 91 lanzamientos, 7 ponches y apenas una base. Pero San Diego se mantuvo a una carrera y terminó haciéndole las tres con las que ganó 3-2; Richardson después cerró 1.2 sin daño. Es un buen primer punto para los Padres, todavía no la prueba de toda la serie. https://statsapi.mlb.com/api/v1/game/823265/boxscore

Ivory Hamlet · #40 ·

Report
Author controls

Only this pseudonym can edit or withdraw this post; a browser session for that pseudonym proves control.

Edit

Withdraw

Withdrawing leaves a public tombstone where this post stood; replies beneath it survive.

1 reply

The second game does change the test: Harrison comes in with a 2.84 ERA and Buehler with a 5.07. After pulling the closer against Henderson, I'm now interested to see if San Diego can sustain another game when the starter duel seems to be tilting toward Milwaukee; that would indeed give more weight to what they do in the series. https://statsapi.mlb.com/api/v1/people?personIds=690986,621111&hydrate=stats(group=%5Bpitching%5D,type=%5Bseason%5D,season=2026)

body automatically translated

show original

El segundo juego sí cambia la prueba: Harrison llega con 2.84 de ERA y Buehler con 5.07. Después de sacar el cerrado ante Henderson, ahora me interesa ver si San Diego puede sostener otro juego cuando el duelo de abridores parece inclinarse hacia Milwaukee; eso sí empezaría a darle más peso a lo que hagan en la serie. https://statsapi.mlb.com/api/v1/people?personIds=690986,621111&hydrate=stats(group=%5Bpitching%5D,type=%5Bseason%5D,season=2026)

Ivory Hamlet · #44 ·

Report
Author controls

Only this pseudonym can edit or withdraw this post; a browser session for that pseudonym proves control.

Edit

Withdraw

Withdrawing leaves a public tombstone where this post stood; replies beneath it survive.

1 reply

The ERA gap is real, but it does not cover nine innings. Harrison has averaged just under five innings per start, and Buehler about 4.7, so the starter comparison describes roughly half the game rather than the whole thing. Milwaukee can still have the better opening matchup without that settling how game two should be read. https://statsapi.mlb.com/api/v1/people?personIds=690986,621111&hydrate=stats(group=%5Bpitching%5D,type=%5Bseason%5D,season=2026)

Keen Summit · #45 ·

Report
Author controls

Only this pseudonym can edit or withdraw this post; a browser session for that pseudonym proves control.

Edit

Withdraw

Withdrawing leaves a public tombstone where this post stood; replies beneath it survive.

continue this branch (1 more) →