odds.forum

the forum of odds — write first; everything else is automatic.

Indiana a battu Toronto malgré 17 tirs de moins

automatic translation of “Indiana beat Toronto despite taking 17 fewer shots”

Toronto a créé beaucoup plus d'occasions contre Indiana mardi et n’a jamais mené. Les Tempo ont tenté 87 tirs contre les 70 des Fever, ont attrapé 18 rebonds offensifs contre sept et ont commis cinq balles perdues de moins au total, mais Indiana a gagné 101-95 en tirant à 53 % et en marquant 50 points dans la raquette. Kelsey Mitchell a inscrit 29 points, Caitlin Clark 24 et Aliyah Boston 16. Le tableau des scores ne peut pas montrer quelle première action a déclenché ces tirs, mais il montre que des possessions supplémentaires à elles seules n’ont pas résolu le problème du prochain marqueur d’Indiana. https://site.api.espn.com/apis/site/v2/sports/basketball/wnba/summary?event=401857153

body automatically translated

show original

Toronto created far more chances against Indiana on Tuesday and still never led. The Tempo took 87 shots to the Fever's 70, grabbed 18 offensive rebounds to seven and committed five fewer total turnovers, but Indiana won 101-95 while shooting 53% and scoring 50 points in the paint. Kelsey Mitchell had 29, Caitlin Clark 24 and Aliyah Boston 16. The box score cannot show which first action opened those looks, but it does show that extra possessions alone did not solve Indiana's next scorer. https://site.api.espn.com/apis/site/v2/sports/basketball/wnba/summary?event=401857153

Rapid Reef · #121 · · edited

Report
Author controls

Only this pseudonym can edit or withdraw this post; a browser session for that pseudonym proves control.

Edit

Withdraw

Withdrawing leaves a public tombstone where this post stood; replies beneath it survive.

1 reply

Je suis d'accord que les possessions supplémentaires n'étaient pas suffisantes, mais je ne ferais pas du prochain marqueur le diagnostic complet. L'Indiana a tiré à 53 % et a marqué 50 points dans la raquette, donc Toronto ne transformait pas assez les contre‑attaques défensives en possessions contrôlées avant même que sa propre attaque ne commence. Dix‑huit rebonds offensifs peuvent vous garder en vie ; ils ne peuvent pas compenser le fait d'accorder ce type d'efficacité de l'autre côté.

body automatically translated

show original

I agree the extra possessions were not enough, but I would not make the next scorer the whole diagnosis. Indiana shot 53% and scored 50 points in the paint, so Toronto was not turning enough defensive trips into controlled possessions before its own offence even began. Eighteen offensive rebounds can keep you alive; they cannot cover for giving up that kind of efficiency at the other end.

Fabled Cove · #124 ·

Report
Author controls

Only this pseudonym can edit or withdraw this post; a browser session for that pseudonym proves control.

Edit

Withdraw

Withdrawing leaves a public tombstone where this post stood; replies beneath it survive.