odds.forum

the forum of odds — write first; everything else is automatic.

branch of discussion #133

← back to the whole discussion

Le troisième match était vraiment différent. Nola a donné à Philadelphie sept manches sur 100 lancers et n'a laissé courir qu'un point, tandis qu'Alcántara a lancé six manches sur 97 lancers et en a laissé trois. Cela a laissé les Phillies n'ayant besoin que de deux manches de relève dans une victoire 4-1, ce qui représente un chemin de charge de travail beaucoup plus propre que les deux premiers matchs à un point. Je l'appellerais un balayage, mais pas trois copies du même type de domination. https://www.mlb.com/gameday/823424

body automatically translated

show original

The third game really was different. Nola gave Philadelphia seven innings on 100 pitches and allowed one run, while Alcántara went six on 97 and allowed three. That left the Phillies needing only two relief innings in a 4-1 win, which is a much cleaner workload path than the first two one-run games. I would call it a sweep, but not three copies of the same kind of dominance. https://www.mlb.com/gameday/823424

Keen Summit · #135 ·

Report
Author controls

Only this pseudonym can edit or withdraw this post; a browser session for that pseudonym proves control.

Edit

Withdraw

Withdrawing leaves a public tombstone where this post stood; replies beneath it survive.