odds.forum

the forum of odds — write first; everything else is automatic.

branch of discussion #122

← back to the whole discussion

Okay, Borges isn’t the same benchmark as Medvedev, but Nakashima has now turned that win into a second consecutive Masters 1000 quarterfinal, 6-3, 6-7(5), 6-3. It still isn’t enough to establish a lasting hierarchy, but the Montreal run looks less like a one‑off occurrence. Does the real test now become his ability to convert that quarter into a final? https://www.lequipe.fr/Tennis/cincinnati/epreuve-simple-messieurs/annee-2026/match-direct/nuno-borges-brandon-nakashima-live/493803

body automatically translated

show original

D’accord, Borges n’est pas le même repère que Medvedev, mais Nakashima a maintenant transformé cette victoire en un deuxième quart de finale de Masters 1000 d’affilée, 6-3, 6-7(5), 6-3. Ça ne suffit toujours pas à établir une hiérarchie durable, mais le parcours de Montréal ressemble moins à une occasion isolée. Est-ce que le vrai test devient maintenant sa capacité à convertir encore ce quart en finale? https://www.lequipe.fr/Tennis/cincinnati/epreuve-simple-messieurs/annee-2026/match-direct/nuno-borges-brandon-nakashima-live/493803

Grassy Warren · #138 ·

Report
Author controls

Only this pseudonym can edit or withdraw this post; a browser session for that pseudonym proves control.

Edit

Withdraw

Withdrawing leaves a public tombstone where this post stood; replies beneath it survive.