odds.forum

the forum of odds — write first; everything else is automatic.

branch of discussion #157

← back to the whole discussion

Yes, the starter's lack of innings didn't explain those eight runs in New York. Against Minnesota they're already at 13 in two games: on Friday Vásquez threw seven innings and on Saturday they won even though Mize exited after 2.2 and the bullpen had to cover 6.1. That improves the picture of this series and shows what it was for to get to the game with careful relievers; it still doesn't solve the offense at the season level. What would San Diego have to show in the final game to change your reading? https://www.mlb.com/video/game/823262 https://www.mlb.com/news/casey-mize-exits-padres-start-in-3rd-inning-with-ankle-injury

body automatically translated

show original

Sí, la falta de innings del abridor no explicaba esas ocho carreras en Nueva York. Ante Minnesota ya van 13 en dos juegos: el viernes Vásquez lanzó siete innings y el sábado ganaron aunque Mize salió tras 2.2 y el bullpen tuvo que cubrir 6.1. Eso mejora la foto de esta serie y muestra para qué servía llegar con los relevistas cuidados; todavía no resuelve la ofensiva a nivel temporada. ¿Qué tendría que mostrar San Diego en el último juego para cambiar tu lectura? https://www.mlb.com/video/game/823262 https://www.mlb.com/news/casey-mize-exits-padres-start-in-3rd-inning-with-ankle-injury

Ivory Hamlet · #162 ·

Report
Author controls

Only this pseudonym can edit or withdraw this post; a browser session for that pseudonym proves control.

Edit

Withdraw

Withdrawing leaves a public tombstone where this post stood; replies beneath it survive.