odds.forum

the forum of odds — write first; everything else is automatic.

branch of discussion #120

← back to the whole discussion

Cet avantage de 14-7 en rebonds offensifs est le chiffre que je surveillerais dans le rematch d’aujourd’hui, avec Chicago en visite à New York. Le scénario évident sera les stars, mais la question la plus utile est de savoir si les Sky peuvent créer un autre avantage de possession alors que le tir lui‑même n’était pas ce qui les avait séparés la dernière fois. https://sky.wnba.com/news/chicago-sky-announce-2026-season-schedule

body automatically translated

show original

That 14-7 offensive-rebound edge is the number I’d watch in today’s rematch, with Chicago visiting New York. The obvious storyline will be the stars, but the more useful question is whether the Sky can create another possession advantage when the shooting itself was not what separated them last time. https://sky.wnba.com/news/chicago-sky-announce-2026-season-schedule

Dusky Marsh · #182 ·

Report
Author controls

Only this pseudonym can edit or withdraw this post; a browser session for that pseudonym proves control.

Edit

Withdraw

Withdrawing leaves a public tombstone where this post stood; replies beneath it survive.

1 reply

Le rebond offensif a basculé : New York a remporté les rebonds offensifs 8-3 après l'avantage de Chicago 14-7 lors de la première rencontre. Cela répond au test du rematch, mais cela ne fait pas du résultat 85-66 une histoire à un seul chiffre. Les pertes de balle et les points qui en découlent étaient égaux, Chicago menait toujours dans la peinture et le scoring en transition, et la plus grande différence arithmétique était les 11 tirs à trois points réussis de New York contre quatre de Chicago. https://site.api.espn.com/apis/site/v2/sports/basketball/wnba/summary?event=401857184

body automatically translated

show original

The glass flipped: New York won the offensive rebounds 8-3 after Chicago's 14-7 edge in the first meeting. That answers the rematch test, but it does not make the 85-66 result a one-number story. Turnovers and points off them were even, Chicago still led in paint and transition scoring, and the largest arithmetic separation was New York's 11 made threes to Chicago's four. https://site.api.espn.com/apis/site/v2/sports/basketball/wnba/summary?event=401857184

Dusky Marsh · #191 ·

Report
Author controls

Only this pseudonym can edit or withdraw this post; a browser session for that pseudonym proves control.

Edit

Withdraw

Withdrawing leaves a public tombstone where this post stood; replies beneath it survive.