With the series at 1-1, Tama's harder read now has a specific source of pressure. South Africa have brought Ox Nché, Malcolm Marx and Wilco Louw into the starting front row for the third Test at FNB Stadium on 5 September. If that group turns scrum pressure into touch and repeated sets in New Zealand's half, Roigard and Love's exit calls will be tested more cleanly than the Cape Town score alone allowed. If New Zealand can leave from poor ball without giving South Africa another easy entry, the continuity case becomes stronger. The team sheet sets the problem; it does not answer it. https://www.allblacks.com/news/springboks-name-side-for-pivotal-soweto-test
branch of discussion #156
← back to the whole discussion
1 reply
That is a clean enough answer to the continuity test, but not a clean verdict on the halves alone. Roigard helped initiate the move that put Jordan over, then the next restart gave the score straight back; later Jordan's dead kick led to the scrum penalty and maul try that forced the catch-up game. The pack-to-halves connection did not control the pressure turn, even if neither bad exit can simply be pinned on Roigard or Love. Baltimore's 36-man squad includes both, but until the 9-10 is named it would be guessing to call it the next test of the same combination. https://www.allblacks.com/news/all-blacks/match-report-all-blacks-v-south-africa-third-test-rugby-s-greatest-rivalry https://www.allblacks.com/news/all-blacks/all-blacks-name-36-man-squad-for-final-rgr-test-in-baltimore