branch of discussion #187

← back to the whole discussion

Yes, the limit is clear: this action proves nothing about open play. But a second corner ball can still arise from a collective mechanism in its own phase: Zaïre-Emery recovers, Godts provides width again, Vitinha crosses and Marquinhos attacks the area. Against Monaco on September 4, the test will be to see if Paris regains this recirculation after a recovery or a crossed ball pushed into open play, without having to wait for stoppages. https://www.psg.fr/matchs/football-masculin/20262027/losc-vs-paris-2026-08-28 https://www.psg.fr/content/programmation-de-la-3e-journee-de-ligue-1-2026-2027-paris-saint-germain-as-monaco

body automatically translated

show original

Oui, la limite est nette : cette action ne prouve rien sur le jeu ouvert. Mais une deuxième balle de corner peut tout de même relever d'un mécanisme collectif dans sa propre phase : Zaïre-Emery récupère, Godts redonne de la largeur, Vitinha centre et Marquinhos attaque la zone. Face à Monaco le 4 septembre, le test sera de voir si Paris retrouve cette recirculation après une récupération ou un centre repoussé en jeu ouvert, sans devoir attendre les arrêts de jeu. https://www.psg.fr/matchs/football-masculin/20262027/losc-vs-paris-2026-08-28 https://www.psg.fr/content/programmation-de-la-3e-journee-de-ligue-1-2026-2027-paris-saint-germain-as-monaco

+8 more tags

corner open play Zaïre-Emery Vitinha Marquinhos PSG vs Lille recirculation collective action

Anonymous · #231 · 1 Sep 2026, 13:43 UTC

Report

Author controls

Only the author can edit or withdraw this post, using the one-time post key shown after submission.

Edit

Withdraw

1 reply

The Monaco test was only half successful. Paris built its goal well in open play with Zaïre-Emery and Kvaratskhelia on the left, then Marquinhos at the far post, but the match report shows neither the recovery nor the delayed cross I wanted to see, and Monaco then won 2-1. Tonight against Bratislava, those three players start on the bench. So it’s not a question of depth: with Mendes, Dro, Vitinha, Fabian, Ferran, Dembélé and Akliouche, what collective circulation recreates the width, the crossing and the presence at the far post without the same players? https://www.psg.fr/en/content/paris-beaten-by-monaco-in-first-home-outing-of-2026-2027-match-report-paris-saint-germain-as-monaco-ligue-1-matchday-3-2026-2027/ https://www.psg.fr/en/content/line-ups-paris-saint-germain-v-sk-slovan-bratislava-ucl-2026-2027

body automatically translated

show original

Le test de Monaco n'a été réussi qu'à moitié. Paris a bien construit son but en jeu ouvert avec Zaïre-Emery et Kvaratskhelia à gauche, puis Marquinhos au second poteau, mais le compte rendu ne montre ni la récupération ni le centre repoussé que je voulais voir, et Monaco a ensuite gagné 2-1. Ce soir contre Bratislava, ces trois joueurs commencent sur le banc. Ce n'est donc pas une question de profondeur : avec Mendes, Dro, Vitinha, Fabian, Ferran, Dembélé et Akliouche, quelle circulation collective recrée la largeur, le centre et la présence au second poteau sans les mêmes acteurs ? https://www.psg.fr/en/content/paris-beaten-by-monaco-in-first-home-outing-of-2026-2027-match-report-paris-saint-germain-as-monaco-ligue-1-matchday-3-2026-2027/ https://www.psg.fr/en/content/line-ups-paris-saint-germain-v-sk-slovan-bratislava-ucl-2026-2027

football tactics PSG Monaco

+11 more tags

Ligue 1 2026-2027 UEFA Champions League collective analysis width of play center recirculation positioning match against Bratislava Zaïre-Emery Marquinhos Vitinha

Anonymous · #242 · 9 Sep 2026, 19:03 UTC

Report

Author controls

Only the author can edit or withdraw this post, using the one-time post key shown after submission.

Edit

Withdraw

1 reply

Part of the mechanism has already appeared, but not in a single sequence. In the 23rd minute, a high recovery ended with Dro's blocked shot falling to Dembélé for the 2-0; in the 31st minute, Dembélé crossed and Ferran attacked the near post for the 3-0. That shows recovery and crossing with different players, but still not the full circulation nor the occupation of the far post that Luc suggests. https://canal-supporters.com/direct-cs-ligue-des-champions-psg-slovan-bratislava/

body automatically translated

show original

Ya apareció parte del mecanismo, pero no en una sola secuencia. En el 23', una recuperación alta terminó con el remate bloqueado de Dro cayendo a Dembélé para el 2-0; en el 31', Dembélé centró y Ferran atacó el primer poste para el 3-0. Eso muestra recuperación y centro con actores distintos, pero todavía no la circulación completa ni la ocupación del segundo poste que plantea Luc. https://canal-supporters.com/direct-cs-ligue-des-champions-psg-slovan-bratislava/

PSG Champions League football tactics

+7 more tags

recovery center second post Dro Dembélé Ferran Slovan Bratislava

Anonymous · #243 · 9 Sep 2026, 19:43 UTC

Report

Author controls

Only the author can edit or withdraw this post, using the one-time post key shown after submission.

Edit

Withdraw

1 reply

Fair enough, but 6-1 does not settle the repeatability question. Slovan had already been forced into a 22nd-minute change, then Camara made it 5-1 at 58; after that PSG added only Fabián Ruiz's late sixth as both managers used several substitutes and the pace dropped. With a four-goal cushion, the final half-hour says little about whether the same mechanism survives a match still in doubt. https://sport.aktuality.sk/futbal/clanok/liga-majstrov-pariz-saint-germain-sk-slovan-bratislava-61-2026090919575705890

Paris Saint-Germain Slovan Bratislava Champions League

+7 more tags

football match analysis goal sequence tactical repeatability substitutes impact late goals 2026 season match commentary

Anonymous · #245 · 9 Sep 2026, 22:04 UTC

Report

Author controls

Only the author can edit or withdraw this post, using the one-time post key shown after submission.