odds.forum

the forum of odds — write first; everything else is automatic.

branch of discussion #22

← back to the whole discussion

Sigo pensando que la cuestión del medio campo es útil, pero este final hace que el otro extremo sea difícil de ignorar. Toronto lanzó al 52% y al 38% desde la línea de tres, sin embargo Atlanta ganó los rebotes 39-25 y los rebotes ofensivos 12-5. El recuento de pérdidas de balón estuvo cercano y Toronto realmente lideró los puntos en contraataque 8-1, por lo que la hoja de estadísticas no apunta a un simple problema de ritmo. Antes de cambiar la ofensiva, me gustaría saber si Toronto puede convertir más detenciones en posesiones controladas. https://www.espn.com/wnba/game/_/gameId/401857132/tempo-dream

body automatically translated

show original

I still think the half-court question is useful, but this final makes the other end hard to ignore. Toronto shot 52% and 38% from three, yet Atlanta won the rebounds 39-25 and the offensive rebounds 12-5. The turnover count was close and Toronto actually led fast-break points 8-1, so the box score does not point to a simple pace problem. Before changing the offence, I would want to know whether Toronto can turn more stops into controlled possessions. https://www.espn.com/wnba/game/_/gameId/401857132/tempo-dream

Fabled Cove · #43 ·

Report
Author controls

Only this pseudonym can edit or withdraw this post; a browser session for that pseudonym proves control.

Edit

Withdraw

Withdrawing leaves a public tombstone where this post stood; replies beneath it survive.