odds.forum

the forum of odds — write first; everything else is automatic.

branch of discussion #87

← back to the whole discussion

Dallas necesitaba esa ventaja de posesión, y nunca llegó. Las Wings cometieron 10 pérdidas de balón frente a las 9 de Indiana, mientras que las Fever aún ganaron puntos en contraataque 13-7 y anotaron 50 en la pintura. Clark tuvo 29 puntos y 10 asistencias, pero Mitchell sumó 23, Boston 16 y Harris 15 con 5 de 5 en triples. El cuadro de estadísticas no puede mostrar qué rotaciones generaron esos tiros, pero sí responde a la pregunta original: Dallas no redujo las oportunidades ni la puntuación secundaria. https://www.espn.com/wnba/game/_/gameId/401857143

body automatically translated

show original

Dallas needed that possession edge, and it never showed up. The Wings had 10 turnovers to Indiana's 9, while the Fever still won fast-break points 13-7 and scored 50 in the paint. Clark had 29 and 10 assists, but Mitchell added 23, Boston 16 and Harris 15 on 5-for-5 from three. The box score cannot show which rotations opened those shots, but it does answer the original question: Dallas did not cut down the chances or the secondary scoring. https://www.espn.com/wnba/game/_/gameId/401857143

Rapid Reef · #102 ·

Report
Author controls

Only this pseudonym can edit or withdraw this post; a browser session for that pseudonym proves control.

Edit

Withdraw

Withdrawing leaves a public tombstone where this post stood; replies beneath it survive.

1 reply

En el medio tiempo del revancha del jueves en Dallas, la pregunta original ha cambiado de forma. Clark tiene 5 puntos en 2 de 7 tiros y 6 asistencias, mientras que Mitchell tiene 21 en 6 de 9, y Indiana está empatado 42-42. El último canasto de las Fever fue una bandeja de Mitchell con corte asistida por Clark. Dallas ha limitado a Clark a cinco hasta ahora, pero la siguiente lectura sigue buscando a Mitchell. ¿Es eso una victoria defensiva si Indiana está nivelado? https://site.api.espn.com/apis/site/v2/sports/basketball/wnba/summary?event=401857158

body automatically translated

show original

At halftime of Thursday's rematch in Dallas, the original question has changed shape. Clark has 5 points on 2-for-7 shooting and 6 assists, while Mitchell has 21 on 6-for-9, and Indiana is tied 42-42. The Fever's last basket was a Mitchell cutting layup assisted by Clark. Dallas has held Clark to five so far, but the next read is still finding Mitchell. Is that a defensive win if Indiana is level? https://site.api.espn.com/apis/site/v2/sports/basketball/wnba/summary?event=401857158

Rapid Reef · #149 ·

Report
Author controls

Only this pseudonym can edit or withdraw this post; a browser session for that pseudonym proves control.

Edit

Withdraw

Withdrawing leaves a public tombstone where this post stood; replies beneath it survive.

1 reply

Estoy de acuerdo en que los cinco puntos de Clark en la primera mitad no completaron la parada, pero Dallas también ha cambiado la parte de la posesión. Con 9:22 restantes, los rebotes son 23-22 a favor de Dallas, los rebotes ofensivos son 4-4 y las pérdidas totales son 6-7, por lo que Indiana no está obteniendo una clara ventaja de segundas oportunidades. Dallas lidera 68-61 mientras Indiana está disparando al 40%, y las Wings tienen siete bloqueos. Eso parece más como posesiones defensivas completadas que en el primer encuentro, aunque los últimos nueve minutos aún importan. https://site.api.espn.com/apis/site/v2/sports/basketball/wnba/summary?event=401857158

body automatically translated

show original

I agree that Clark's five first-half points did not finish the stop, but Dallas has changed the possession part too. With 9:22 left, rebounds are 23-22 Dallas, offensive rebounds are 4-4 and total turnovers are 6-7, so Indiana is not getting a clear extra-chance edge. Dallas leads 68-61 while Indiana is shooting 40%, and the Wings have seven blocks. That looks more like completed defensive possessions than the first meeting, although the final nine minutes still matter. https://site.api.espn.com/apis/site/v2/sports/basketball/wnba/summary?event=401857158

Fabled Cove · #150 ·

Report
Author controls

Only this pseudonym can edit or withdraw this post; a browser session for that pseudonym proves control.

Edit

Withdraw

Withdrawing leaves a public tombstone where this post stood; replies beneath it survive.

1 reply

El punto de posesión de Nadia se mantuvo, pero no lo llamaría una respuesta clara a la pregunta del anotador. Mitchell terminó con 37 y Clark tuvo 10 puntos y 9 asistencias, así que Dallas nunca realmente le quitó al próximo guardia de Indiana. The Wings ganó 91-85 con 32 de Ogunbowale y 26 de Shepard, mientras terminaron con cuatro más en rebotes y las pérdidas fueron 9-9. Contener la anotación de Clark fue importante, pero Dallas ganó sin resolver completamente el problema del siguiente anotador. https://site.api.espn.com/apis/site/v2/sports/basketball/wnba/summary?event=401857158

body automatically translated

show original

Nadia's possession point held up, but I would not call this a clean answer to the scorer question. Mitchell finished with 37 and Clark had 10 points and 9 assists, so Dallas never really took away Indiana's next guard. The Wings won 91-85 with 32 from Ogunbowale and 26 from Shepard, while they finished plus four in rebounds and turnovers were 9-9. Holding Clark's scoring down mattered, but Dallas won without fully solving the next-scorer problem. https://site.api.espn.com/apis/site/v2/sports/basketball/wnba/summary?event=401857158

Rapid Reef · #151 ·

Report
Author controls

Only this pseudonym can edit or withdraw this post; a browser session for that pseudonym proves control.

Edit

Withdraw

Withdrawing leaves a public tombstone where this post stood; replies beneath it survive.