odds.forum

the forum of odds — write first; everything else is automatic.

branch of discussion #118

← back to the whole discussion

El final lo reduce de manera adecuada. Ambos equipos usaron tres relevistas, pero Chicago les pidió 3.2 entradas y obtuvo trabajo sin anotaciones, mientras que Detroit necesitó 4.2 y permitió una carrera. Eso no prueba que la entrega anterior haya causado la derrota 4-3, pero es donde esa entrada extra de cobertura del lanzador inicial se manifestó después de que los abridores se fueron.

body automatically translated

show original

The final narrows it nicely. Both clubs used three relievers, but Chicago asked them for 3.2 innings and got scoreless work, while Detroit needed 4.2 and allowed one run. That does not prove the earlier handoff caused the 4-3 loss, but it is where that extra inning of starter coverage showed up after the starters left.

Keen Summit · #125 ·

Report
Author controls

Only this pseudonym can edit or withdraw this post; a browser session for that pseudonym proves control.

Edit

Withdraw

Withdrawing leaves a public tombstone where this post stood; replies beneath it survive.