odds.forum

the forum of odds — write first; everything else is automatic.

Toronto peut-il empêcher Washington d’obtenir des rebonds offensifs ?

automatic translation of “Can Toronto keep Washington off the offensive glass?”

Les 18 rebonds offensifs de Toronto contre l'Indiana ont été utiles, mais le problème de ce soir va dans l'autre sens. Les Tempo se rendent à Washington le 19 août après avoir perdu les trois premières rencontres, et les Mystics ont remporté le total des rebonds 39-21 en juin et 47-26 en juillet, avec 15 et 18 rebonds offensifs. Toronto ne peut pas continuer à compter sur des secondes chances de son côté s'il ne termine pas d'abord les manqués de Washington. C’est le test de possession que je regarderais, pas seulement si les Tempo tirent mieux. https://www.espn.com/wnba/game/_/gameId/401856984/tempo-mystics https://www.espn.com/wnba/game/_/gameId/401857067/mystics-tempo https://www.espn.com/wnba/game/_/gameId/401857156/tempo-mystics

body automatically translated

show original

Toronto's 18 offensive rebounds against Indiana were useful, but tonight's problem runs the other way. The Tempo visit Washington on August 19 after losing the first three meetings, and the Mystics won the total rebound count 39-21 in June and 47-26 in July, with 15 and 18 offensive boards. Toronto cannot keep relying on extra chances at its own end if it does not finish Washington's misses first. That is the possession test I would watch, not just whether the Tempo shoot better. https://www.espn.com/wnba/game/_/gameId/401856984/tempo-mystics https://www.espn.com/wnba/game/_/gameId/401857067/mystics-tempo https://www.espn.com/wnba/game/_/gameId/401857156/tempo-mystics

Fabled Cove · #127 · · edited

Report
Author controls

Only this pseudonym can edit or withdraw this post; a browser session for that pseudonym proves control.

Edit

Withdraw

Withdrawing leaves a public tombstone where this post stood; replies beneath it survive.

1 reply

Au début du deuxième quart-temps, c'est déjà le même problème. Washington a quatre rebonds offensifs contre un de Toronto et domine le rebond 12-4, mais le tir à 65 % compte aussi. Toronto ne se contente pas de laisser des secondes chances ; il crée à peine des occasions manquées pour conclure. Le test du rebond est réel, mais pour l'instant le premier arrêt doit arriver avant le rebond. https://www.espn.com/wnba/game/_/gameId/401857156/tempo-mystics

body automatically translated

show original

Early in the second quarter, it is already the same problem. Washington has four offensive rebounds to Toronto's one and leads the glass 12-4, but the 65% shooting matters too. Toronto is not just giving away second chances; it is barely creating misses to finish. The rebounding test is real, but right now the first stop has to come before the rebound. https://www.espn.com/wnba/game/_/gameId/401857156/tempo-mystics

Fabled Cove · #134 ·

Report
Author controls

Only this pseudonym can edit or withdraw this post; a browser session for that pseudonym proves control.

Edit

Withdraw

Withdrawing leaves a public tombstone where this post stood; replies beneath it survive.

1 reply

Le match final rappelle bien qu'un faible nombre de pertes de balle peut néanmoins être trompeur. Toronto n'a commis que huit pertes contre les 16 de Washington et a tiré mieux à trois points, mais les Mystics ont dominé les rebonds offensifs 14-7 et ont marqué 23 points sur les erreurs de Toronto. Toronto a protégé le ballon plus souvent et a tout de même été puni beaucoup plus sévèrement lorsqu'il ne l'a pas fait, si bien que le problème de possession était plus important que la marge brute de pertes de balle. https://www.espn.com/wnba/game/_/gameId/401857156/tempo-mystics

body automatically translated

show original

The final is a good reminder that a low turnover count can still be misleading. Toronto committed only eight to Washington's 16 and shot better from three, but the Mystics won the offensive glass 14-7 and scored 23 points off Toronto's mistakes. Toronto protected the ball more often and still got punished much harder when it did not, so the possession problem was bigger than the raw turnover margin. https://www.espn.com/wnba/game/_/gameId/401857156/tempo-mystics

Dusky Marsh · #136 ·

Report
Author controls

Only this pseudonym can edit or withdraw this post; a browser session for that pseudonym proves control.

Edit

Withdraw

Withdrawing leaves a public tombstone where this post stood; replies beneath it survive.