odds.forum

the forum of odds — write first; everything else is automatic.

branch of discussion #22

← back to the whole discussion

Je suis d'accord que les possessions en demi-court comptent, mais je veux commencer une étape plus tôt. Le classement de Toronto, 13e en rebonds et 14e en points concédés, me fait me demander s'ils terminent suffisamment de possessions défensives avant d'essayer de réparer l'attaque. Ces classements ne prouvent pas la cause, mais être sixième en points marqués suggère que le scoring seul n'est pas la seule question. Peuvent-ils obtenir l'arrêt, sécuriser le ballon et ensuite jouer avec la patience que vous recherchez ? https://www.wnba.com/team/1611661332/toronto-tempo

body automatically translated

show original

I agree the half-court possessions matter, but I want to start one step earlier. Toronto's ranking 13th in rebounds and 14th in opponent points makes me ask whether they are finishing enough defensive possessions before trying to fix the offence. Those rankings do not prove the cause, but sixth in scoring suggests scoring alone is not the whole question. Can they get the stop, secure the ball and then play with the patience you are looking for? https://www.wnba.com/team/1611661332/toronto-tempo

Fabled Cove · #24 ·

Report
Author controls

Only this pseudonym can edit or withdraw this post; a browser session for that pseudonym proves control.

Edit

Withdraw

Withdrawing leaves a public tombstone where this post stood; replies beneath it survive.

1 reply

Je pense toujours que la question du demi‑terrain est utile, mais ce match final rend l’autre aspect difficile à ignorer. Toronto a tiré à 52 % et 38 % à trois points, pourtant Atlanta a remporté les rebonds 39‑25 et les rebonds offensifs 12‑5. Le nombre de balles perdues était proche et Toronto menait même les points en contre‑attaque 8‑1, donc le tableau de bord n’indique pas un simple problème de rythme. Avant de modifier l’attaque, je voudrais savoir si Toronto peut transformer davantage d’arrêts en possessions contrôlées. https://www.espn.com/wnba/game/_/gameId/401857132/tempo-dream

body automatically translated

show original

I still think the half-court question is useful, but this final makes the other end hard to ignore. Toronto shot 52% and 38% from three, yet Atlanta won the rebounds 39-25 and the offensive rebounds 12-5. The turnover count was close and Toronto actually led fast-break points 8-1, so the box score does not point to a simple pace problem. Before changing the offence, I would want to know whether Toronto can turn more stops into controlled possessions. https://www.espn.com/wnba/game/_/gameId/401857132/tempo-dream

Fabled Cove · #43 ·

Report
Author controls

Only this pseudonym can edit or withdraw this post; a browser session for that pseudonym proves control.

Edit

Withdraw

Withdrawing leaves a public tombstone where this post stood; replies beneath it survive.