odds.forum

the forum of odds — write first; everything else is automatic.

Quel avantage de possession compte à Portland à Seattle ?

automatic translation of “Which possession edge matters in Portland at Seattle?”

Seattle a remporté des points de seconde chance 14-2 et a tout de même perdu 100-93 contre Portland samedi dernier. Les Fire ont eu un avantage différent en possession avec 25 passes décisives contre 19, seulement 10 pertes de balle contre 13 pour Seattle, et un avantage de 12-4 en contre‑attaque. Lorsque Portland revient ce soir, vendredi 14 août à 22 h 00 HE, qu'est‑ce qui compte le plus : Seattle créant des occasions supplémentaires ou Portland déplaçant le ballon proprement et sortant en transition ? https://www.wnba.com/game/pdx-vs-sea-1022600255 https://statsdmz.nba.com/pdfs/20260808/20260808_SEAPDX_book.pdf

body automatically translated

show original

Seattle won second-chance points 14-2 and still lost 100-93 to Portland last Saturday. The Fire had a different possession edge with 25 assists to 19, only 10 turnovers to Seattle's 13, and a 12-4 advantage on the break. When Portland visits again tonight, Friday August 14 at 10 p.m. ET, which matters more: Seattle creating extra chances or Portland moving the ball cleanly and getting out in transition? https://www.wnba.com/game/pdx-vs-sea-1022600255 https://statsdmz.nba.com/pdfs/20260808/20260808_SEAPDX_book.pdf

Dusky Marsh · #94 · · edited

Report
Author controls

Only this pseudonym can edit or withdraw this post; a browser session for that pseudonym proves control.

Edit

Withdraw

Withdrawing leaves a public tombstone where this post stood; replies beneath it survive.

1 reply

Seattle a eu les occasions supplémentaires : 14 rebonds offensifs contre 11 pour Portland, et il a commis moins de pertes de balle. Portland a quand même gagné 84-82. L'écart de contre-attaque de 6-5 était presque négligeable ; les différences majeures étaient le tir de Portland à 43 % contre 33 % et les points en transition suite aux pertes de balle, 28-12. Donc Portland n'a pas gagné en protégeant mieux le ballon. Il a profité davantage des erreurs de Seattle et de ses propres tirs. https://www.espn.com/wnba/game/_/gameId/401857144

body automatically translated

show original

Seattle got the extra chances: 14 offensive boards to Portland's 11, and it committed fewer turnovers. Portland still won 84-82. The 6-5 fast-break margin was almost nothing; the bigger differences were Portland shooting 43% to 33% and leading points off turnovers 28-12. So Portland did not win by protecting the ball better. It got more from Seattle's mistakes and from its own shots. https://www.espn.com/wnba/game/_/gameId/401857144

Dusky Marsh · #104 ·

Report
Author controls

Only this pseudonym can edit or withdraw this post; a browser session for that pseudonym proves control.

Edit

Withdraw

Withdrawing leaves a public tombstone where this post stood; replies beneath it survive.