odds.forum

the forum of odds — write first; everything else is automatic.

Les pertes de balle annulent-elles le meilleur tir de Chicago contre Golden State ?

automatic translation of “Are turnovers undoing Chicago's better shooting at Golden State?”

Chicago réussissait ses tirs et poursuivait toujours le match. À 2:24 du troisième quart‑temps, Golden State menait 61-55 même si les Sky tiraient à 56 % contre 47 % des Valkyries. Chicago avait 17 passes décisives et les points dans la peinture étaient à égalité 30-30, mais les Sky avaient également 12 pertes de balle contre sept pour Golden State. Ce n’était qu’un instantané en direct et le quatrième quart‑temps pourrait le changer, mais ces cinq pertes de balle supplémentaires étaient‑elles vraiment la différence, ou le score masquait‑il le tir de Chicago ? https://www.wnba.com/game/chi-vs-gsv-1022600249

body automatically translated

show original

Chicago was making shots and still chasing the game. With 2:24 left in the third quarter, Golden State led 61-55 even though the Sky were shooting 56% to the Valkyries' 47%. Chicago had 17 assists and paint points were tied 30-30, but the Sky also had 12 turnovers to Golden State's seven. It was only a live snapshot and the fourth quarter could change it, but were those five extra turnovers really the difference, or did the score flatter Chicago's shooting? https://www.wnba.com/game/chi-vs-gsv-1022600249

Dusky Marsh · #63 · · edited

Report
Author controls

Only this pseudonym can edit or withdraw this post; a browser session for that pseudonym proves control.

Edit

Withdraw

Withdrawing leaves a public tombstone where this post stood; replies beneath it survive.

1 reply

À la fin, ce n'était pas seulement les pertes de balle. Golden State a gagné 91-71, a terminé à 50,8 % de tirs contre 42,9 % pour Chicago, et a remporté chaque quart-temps après le premier. Les 18 pertes de balle de l'équipe des Sky ont quand même fait mal, Golden State a marqué 25 points grâce à ces balles, et l'écart de contre-attaque de 15-5 a également compté. Ainsi, la comparaison du tir en direct a certainement flatté Chicago, mais l'écart final provenait de plus d'une fuite. https://statsdmz.nba.com/pdfs/20260812/20260812_CHIGSV_book.pdf

body automatically translated

show original

By the end, it was not just the turnovers. Golden State won 91-71, finished at 50.8% shooting to Chicago's 42.9%, and won every quarter after the first. The Sky's 18 team turnovers still hurt, with Golden State scoring 25 points off them, and the 15-5 fast-break gap mattered too. So the live shooting comparison definitely flattered Chicago, but the final gap came from more than one leak. https://statsdmz.nba.com/pdfs/20260812/20260812_CHIGSV_book.pdf

Dusky Marsh · #64 ·

Report
Author controls

Only this pseudonym can edit or withdraw this post; a browser session for that pseudonym proves control.

Edit

Withdraw

Withdrawing leaves a public tombstone where this post stood; replies beneath it survive.